Tech-ish

*#Here’s the article on 40Tech: How to See What’s Happening On Your Site in Real-time Using Your Log File

There's been a lot of talk lately about the "future of publishing." After all, books have never had as much cash to spare as the recording industry, and look at the mess they're in. Already it is not so difficult for a self-published manuscript to sell itself on Amazon.com. What will happen when everything goes digital? The suggestion is that there will be an opening of the gates, and the latest best-seller will stand on the same virtual shelf with thirty self-published manuscripts. The optimists claim that this is where the great unpublished books will be discovered and pessimists point to the unleashed masses of poorly thought-out, half-written tomes filled with spelling errors. But it doesn't matter if fantastic self-published books are available if they're drowned out by countless other books vying for the consumer's attention. 

Furthermore, as observers like Chris Anderson (in “The Long Tail”) and social scientists like Sheena Iyengar (in her new book “The Art of Choosing”) have pointed out, when confronted with an overwhelming array of choices, most people do not graze more widely. Instead, if they aren’t utterly paralyzed by the prospect, their decisions become even more conservative, zeroing in on what everyone else is buying and grabbing for recognizable brands because making a fully informed decision is just too difficult and time-consuming. As a result, introducing massive amounts of consumer choice leads to situations in which the 10 most popular items command the vast majority of the market share, while thousands of lesser alternatives must divide the leftovers into many tiny portions.

Read the rest of this post »

 

Facebook has given privacy a kick in the groin. If this is news to you, you should probably check out: Facebook's Gone Rogue; It's Time for an Open Alternative [Wired] or Top Ten Reasons You Should Quit Facebook [Gizmodo] or Facebook Further Reduces Your Control Over Personal Information [EFF].

FB Privacy Policy: Longer Than the Constitution

Those who've been watching the plucky start-up were already aware that Facebook is mired in accusations that it was founded by a crook and funded by a nut and some gooks. Into this fray comes Facebook's controversy over their privacy settings. It used to be that Facebook provided a space that was just for friends and family. "Just" as in "only." As in, not public. The new privacy settings even led to a movement last month to have a "Quit Facebook Day." Even if you manage to tackle FB's labyrinth of privacy settings, don't use any apps, or never use FacebookConnect you still can't control what happens when your friends fail to make their stuff private. You can't stop Facebook from censoring your messages. Even if we all flock back to Myspace or Friendster or Tribe [or Whatever] we have no guarantee that that data won't be given away. It would probably be wise to consider anything hosted on a faraway computer you can't control as potentially public, even email. At the very least we should commit to using sites that have consistent and reasonable privacy policies (thus the total opposite of Facebook [1][2]). But entrusting Facebook is clearly no longer the way to go. Here's why. In my myriad conversations about this issue, I get one of three responses:

"I don't care about who sees my data or my friends' data. I posted it so anyone could see it."

This person shouldn't be on Facebook. There are much better public sites that do everything Facebook does but better and more beautifully (more on that later).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"Privacy isn't a big deal to me but there are some things I'd like to put online that I don't want the whole world to see."

This person shouldn't be on Facebook. These are the people Facebook seeks to confound with their myriad privacy on-off switches, e.g. most of us. Because these folks aren't too concerned about most of what we put out there, we won't be meticulous about making sure everything is set to private. We won't think of our Facebook stream as a blog  for all the world to see and eventually we will accidentally post something that will get us embarrassed, fired, divorced or deported.

 

 

 

 

"privacy is very important to me. I only want to share stuff with my friends."

This person shouldn't be on Facebook. Because this person cares about privacy. If anything, they should be boycotting Facebook. Wake up: Facebook wants our info to be public so they can make more money on their ads. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has admitted he's ok with the whole thing being confusing because he doesn't believe in privacy.

email? I shit you not; I'm in love with this site. It's very similar to Tumblr: You can make your stream private so only your friends can follow you or make individual posts private. You can have as many streams as you want, but unlike Tumblr you can post to them simultaneously (like say, for example, I want to post a political song to both my music lifestream and my political lifestream).  But unlike Tumblr, you can import all those old Myspace blogs (or whatever) and unlike Tumblr, did I mention you can POST BY effing EMAIL? Oh, I did? Well, it's a really convenient feature. Also, you can search for users on Posterous, while on Tumblr you can only search for tags. Join me on Posterous!

There you have it: the key to getting the hell off Facebook.

All we have to do is pick one or more of these sites and set it up to deliver what we post to Facebook automatically. This is my current solution to the Facebook debate.  People think I update Facebook daily but I actually update all these other sites and it shows up on my Facebook lifestream too... now I just have to wait for everyone else to figure out these, other, better ways of sharing things exists, so I don't have to login to that-one-site to see what they're up to.  I'm happy to help if you have any questions, though I assure you the point is that they're plenty simple! Do you have easy-to-use sites that you are using to connect with friends? I know there are a ton of others. Recommend them in the comments.

Read the rest of this post »

Read the rest of this post »

Or: The Hardship of Being Ahead of the Curve

Much excitement today surrounds Firefox's fifth birthday. We're reminded how this product that seems indispensable to us today didn't even exist in 2004. Firefox usage is a clear line that separates the old fogies and Luddites from the young, hip and with it. Indeed I can't even imagine who these  sixty percent are that still use Internet Explorer—perhaps people so behind they don't know what a web browser is, and therefore haven't figured out you can use a different one? Most of us have experienced the frustration of trying to convince someone that it really is worth the five minutes it takes to download and install Firefox because the features it provides will improve your life on a daily basis. I want you to take a moment to dwell on this feeling, until your brow is furrowed in relived vexation. I'm asking this, dear reader, because in moments you're going to do the same thing to me. What if I told you that there was a browser out there that was hands-down superior to Firefox, Chrome, Safari and (of course) Explorer? This browser is never mentioned on the articles comparing Firefox's rise to its lesser competitors. And since the techno-sphere is spending the entire day fawning over the Mozilla wonder-child, I get to experience this annoyance all day long. So I'm going to take this opportunity to patiently explain to you, for the second time, why you should download the Opera web browser immediately. Because I care, dammit. Now get that glazed look off your face, the one you see when you try to explain to grandpa how to send a text message. Remember when you figured out that tabbed browsing saved a bunch of memory and was way more convenient than having twenty windows open? It was a big part of why many people switched over to Firefox. Yeah, tabs: Opera invented that.  Not only that, they do it better. You can resize your tabs. Hovering over a tab creates a preview. You can duplicate a tab. You can create "follower" tabs: Once designated, any link you click in the current tab will open in the follower tab.  When you close a tab it goes to the most recent one you used, not the first in the list: a small thing, but having it do the other way in Firefox drives me bananas!

I made my tabs huge, but you can have them normal-sized too
You can select any text and right-click to save it as a note. This feature has saved me so much time! Fuck notepad! When you hit the back button, Opera keeps the page in the cache, so it loads instantly. I cannot understand why other browsers don't do this. You know how sometimes you're on a webpage that's coded for a larger screen and you keep having to scroll to the right to read? Opera has a little button that will fix that: "Fit to Width."  So simple it's brilliant. You'd be forgiven if you didn't know Firefox has added the "recently closed tabs" option, because it is buried in their history menu. Opera had this feature first, and they put it in a more convenient location to the right of your tabs. There is a magical thing called a Torrent file that allows people to download large files  exponentially faster than a normal download. To use one of these files, you need a separate program like BitTorrent. That is unless you're running Opera, where you can download the entirety of Army of Darkness with a single click because they have torrent downloading within the browser. A new tab has a speed dial where you save your favorite  sites.  I think some other browsers are adopting this now, but in Opera you can change the size and layout of your speed dial, and even put any image as a background. You can also run any speed dial by typing it's number into the url. So when I open a new tab, I can click on the little pic of my gmail to take me right there. Or, in the window I'm in, typing the number "two" and hitting enter will take me there. That's faster than Brittany Spear's little sister!
Please keep reading! Or Hula girl gets a lethal shot of Opium!
It's little shortcuts like these that make me miss Opera when I'm stuck on someone else's computer.  Opera has a number of these, but the one that won my heart is the ability to run every search from the URL bar. I have tried explaining this to Firefox users and they point to their lame-ass Google toolbar. Yeah, I have that in Opera too and it's collecting dust. Why? Because it's only convenient if you're searching Google. If you want to search wikipedia, you have to scroll down, switch to wikipedia, run the search, and then remember to switch it back to Google.  In Opera, I can type "w anal fisting" directly into the URL bar, hit enter, and I'm learning the ins-and-outs from Wikipedia as soon as the page has finished loading! Speaking of the URL bar, in the newest release, you can make a nickname for any site and run it from there. So if I want to visit the Glenn Beck website, instead of typing glennbeck.fox.com (or whatever), I can set it to be called "crazytown." Then I only have to type "crazytown" in the URL bar and I'm there! These are not all of the features that Opera has on other browsers, merely the ones that keep me hooked. I've been trying to get you people to try Opera since September of 2006, out of the goodness of my heart, but no! You don't listen. Admittedly I still love and use Firefox too. The thing Firefox still has going for it is that, because it is so popular, it has a lot more apps. And the developers won't start making the cool apps for Opera until you (and you and you and your cousin Lenny) start using Opera. And I want those apps! Dammit! I've shown my true colors. So you see I had a selfish motive after all. Who cares! It's better! Just stop blinking at me inexplicably and go download it!

My boyfriend got miffed at me a few weeks ago. I had put his email in a list that would invite him to join Shelfari. Though he was slightly annoyed to get email from them, he was more annoyed that I gave this site my google name and password. It really didn't occur to me that this was possibly insecure. I would have challenged him as paranoid but the day before I had been downloading aps for facebook. I came across a particularly lovely app that would auto-check your myspace and tell you if you had any updates. But the programmer who wrote the nifty app had taken it down. He had an accidental security hole that allowed the username and password to be transmitted transparently, causing malicious folks access to the email info of those who had the installed the application. I have to remind myself that just becuase I trust the programmer that wrote the program not to do anything shady with my info doesn't mean that its safe to pass it along. Here's another way to look at it: If you have a password, one reason you don't give it out to those you trust is because if there is some kind of security breach -- whether it be a home robbery or online identity theft -- you can detective* out how your password got into the wrong hands. The more people who have access to your info, the more difficult that is. And I have heard of cases where the source wasn't resolved and the same asshole cracker** came back and socked the victim again. This is all a long lead-up to this link, from hackademix.net, about four recent security weaknesses in google. This is particularly telling, as google is so widely respected. I don't know about you, but I'm holding my passwords a little closer to my chest in the future.

Let's hear it for the internet. Through constant innovation, the web seems to be buidling a better everything. Or in this case, a screensaver.

I was just sitting here, in rapt awe of my screensaver, and I thought I'd take a few minutes to tell you why my screensaver is more bad-ass than yours (unless you have the same one, of course). Anyhow, I really want all of my readers to listen to the Derrick Jensen speech I posted in my last blog so I didn't want to have any heavy reading in this one.

The screensaver I use is called "Electric Sheep", so named for the Philip K. Dick novel, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep. It starts with a fractal. Now, I'm used to the electric art of Winamp visualization plug-ins. This makes those look like a fourth graders computer class project (or a Windows Media Player visualization, same thing, really). Each of these fractals is a "sheep". But people who have the screensaver can vote, yay or nay, on whether or not they like the sheep, as the screensaver is going.

The bad ones drop and -- here's the beauty part -- the winners breed. The original sheep is soon lost, as all over the world thousands of people vote for their favorites and these beget newer, more beautiful sheep, for sheep-generations. This adds to the beauty because the sheep are always delicate and extreemely complex, with the whisps and shadows of their electric ancestors still vaguely visible. It also makes them less predictable than your average pixelated visualization, because patterns are not based on a program but on previous sheep. It does all this while your computer is sleeping.

Because people are always voting, the sheep are always changing, so no matter how long you run it, it never gets old. There's no Paula Abdul overseer, the screensaver blends them automatically. However, if you go the website, you can look up a sheeps "lineage" and "genomes." It's a great concept with a stunning execution. If you're still using that bouncing Windows logo, you might want to give this a try. It's freeware. It works for Linux too, but obviously wouldn't be recommended for folks with dial-up connections. http://electricsheep.org/

Last night I was looking for a good way to host pictures on myspace when I got sucked into the blog mashable until three o' clock in the morn'. This is a blog about blogs and the social networking sites, specifically the economics and business models they are using. But they also do a lot of research and talk about various newcomers to the scene.

Here is a summation of what I learned:While everyone knows that myspace has the lead when it comes to the width and breadth of social networking sites, there are some contenders for specific interests. I had heard of deviant art (for artists) but not urbis.com, social networking for writers. There is a new competitor for art by the name of humble voice, which supposedly has a noteably more beautiful interface than myspace. Urbis's strength is the opportunity for criticism of one's work. Both sites have a ranking system, in the tradition of sites like hotornot.com but judging your work, rather than looks. I will most likely start an urbis account for my creative writing, as this blog isn't the appropriate outlet for it.

I am also excited to start an account with bikespace, a social network for cyclists. On bikespace, you can create route maps, form groups of riders, and evite folks on rides. Bikespace is still in beta so newcomers could be influential.

If you are looking for someone to host all the pics and songs you want on your page, try badongo.com. They give you a gig and you can upload files from your computer. They will spit out the html to put it on your page. The only catch is that they delete your content if you are inactive for a month.

If you just want to throw some pics on your myspace, most folks have been using flickr and photobucket. But I am more excited about tinypic, allyoucanupload, and imageshack, which don't require any login information. I'm not a professional photographer, I don't want to chat about my pics. I just want to get them up and out to myspace.

Another interesting addition to the blogoshere are the remixing sites splice and jamglue. At these sites, you can take songs and sound clips with creative commons liscensing and remix them to make new songs. I have been downloading mixing plug-ins from winamp.com but now you can just do it all on the web. Then you can upload it to your blog for all the world (okay, the myspace world) to hear.

 I am most excited about weedshare.com. Put your pipes away, my Oakstermdam friends; it's a music sharing site. If you have been looking for a way to give money to the bands you love but want to keep downloading and sharing music, weedshare might be the answer. Personally, when I get my hands on good music I can't wait to share it with others, particularly because the music I like is not playing on MTV (but then, what is?). The problem is that bands need distribution and the only way to do that has been through record companies. But with weedshare, you become the distributor. You can play any song free three times, then you buy for five dollars. If your friend wants the track, instead of buying it from itunes, they can buy it from you. You get a percentage of the money. Then if your friend passes the song on to someone else, they get a percentage, too. It is a concept so beautiful it makes me want to cry (or are is that the last vestiges of PMS?). More on this later, after I've thoroughly checked out their site.

All in all, the mashable blog raises one particularly interesting point: the more myspace expands, the more it cuts into the business that it is creating. If myspace video becomes hugely successful, youtube will lose their business. While this looks unlikely, it is certainly possible for smaller contenders like those mentioned above. Yet add-ons like this are what made myspace hugely popular. On the other hand, one can't blame myspace for wanting to provide everything, so folks don't have to look to other websites to complete the social networking experience. All this means to my awesome, devoted readers: you will be seeing more and hearing more on my blog in the future.